- 23 June 2016
- Super User
- Hits: 126
Factors of Prison Litigation Unit 2
The First Amendment has been an especially significant aspect of the American Constitution because of the direct nature in which it addresses the American lifestyle. It guarantees the U.S. citizen the freedom where it is structured such that congress should not deprive the citizen the freedom of religion, the freedom of speech and the press while the government is petitioned to readdress any grievances (Government Printing Office, n.d., p. 969).
According to Customwritings, the major provisions therefore are three-fold. First, there is a clause that prohibits
a situation in which the government can prefer one religion to another or establish an official religion (Government Printing Office, n.d., p. 969). The other is the freedom of expression, where citizens and the press are allowed to express their opinion without constraint (Government Printing Office, n.d., p. 1120). Finally, the other provision is that on the rights of assemble and petition where people are given the opportunity to join with the government to seek change through litigation (Government Printing Office, n.d., p. 1187).
All three provisions have been structured to benefit prisoners on various fronts. First, the religious aspect is rather broad and involving all citizens rather than being specific for the prison. The genre that allows freedom of expression, however, is more targeted at prison because it is said that prisoners previously represented themselves in court because of inability to hire an attorney (Blackburn, Fowler, & Pollock, 2012, p. 235). The final provision that covers the rights to assembly and petition is made to affect the prison in a way that makes prison officials be in a position to challenge the government on the key constitutional issues that affect the prison and incarceration units (Cripe, Pearlman, & Kosiak, 2012, p. 117). From the analysis through, the most appropriate provision that is relevant to the prisoners’ perspective is the one that allows freedom of expression especially considering that one may be required to stand for themselves alone in a court of law.